The depth of the cultural analysis was surprising and
refreshing, particularly in the context of the book’s publishing date. That the ideas represented herein would have
been considered radical, even controversial, is perhaps less so an issue
nowadays compared to fifty years ago. As
a member of the military, I found Heinlein’s chapter discussing the difference
between citizens’ and non-citizens’ approach to serving to protect their
society to be rather poignant, given the current efforts in the
To the movie. As a
likely exercise in masochism, I’m going to have to rent it to see just how bad
it was in comparison. I don’t think I
can subject my wife to this one. I
remember not particularly enjoying it back in the day, mostly action and bad
acting with some decent graphics to represent the bugs. How they made two sequels I will not quite
understand; I have no intention of finding out ether. To say they took liberties with the book is
an insulting understatement. No power
armour, just a concentration on the Bugs as bad guys and the ensuing combat
frivolities you can only get from Hollywood; oh yeah, don’t forget the
gratuitous nudity.I’d like to say that Starship Troopers is right up there with other greats like Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. What I cannot reconcile is how the movie rendition of Heinlein’s work is so utterly unlike Ridley Scott’s interpretation of Androids; Bladerunner took liberties as well, but became a great movie that stood up on its own for the quality of it; acting, plot, complexity, computer graphics, production design, et cetera. The movie rendition of Starship Troopers did none of those things.
I may have to reserve the right to exclude this movie from
existence.
No comments:
Post a Comment