A prime example might be George R.R. Martin’s series, A Song
of Ice and Fire. The magic is
minimalistic, the dragons number three total, and not until well into the
series. The majority of the action is based
on high political drama set in a medieval setting, with a brutal war ravaging
the main continent told by about 21,238 different points of view (I exaggerate,
but maybe we could round down to 21k).
Don’t get me wrong, this series had me hooked and I can’t wait to see
how it and the television adaptations develop.
What had me hooked were the engrossing (in some cases just plain gross)
character developments and the way he shows them adapt and react. There are winners, there are losers, and the
losers are typically given the dubious reprieve of losing their heads. Whatever the case, it appears that most
reactions are based on what a person would reasonably come up with, given the
scenario. There are tropes to be sure,
yet it is political fantasy that grips the reader like the snappy dialogue of the
television programs the West Wing, Battlestar Galactica and other high calibre
shows. I suppose GRRM’s background
writing/producing for television might be something of an influence.
So how does one escape the trap that is fantasy
tropism? One method typically pushed is to
read widely in your field. I read reams
of science fiction and fantasy, which provides a gauge for what the industry
would or would not accept; at the very least, how to differentiate myself. Another method would have to be reading
outside of your field, to get an idea for different ways of showing a reader
what you wish to explain. Reading
non-fiction and auto/biographies certainly gives another basis from which to
draw upon. Finally, just plain real life
in general can provide some invaluable clues or triggers for a story. Some of the really bizarre news articles are you
just couldn’t come up with yourself. I
know, I’ve tried it, and I’ve got a particularly vivid and flourishing
imagination. Cases in point:
No comments:
Post a Comment